alfonzo
Newcomer
Posts: 7
Registered: May 3, 2011 18:24:36 GMT -5
|
Post by alfonzo on Sept 11, 2011 14:23:34 GMT -5
when you guys qualify a girl, (lets say mystery's classic 'beauty is common' gambit) do you use cold reading to tell her what makes her special (truisms, etc), or do you get HER to tell YOU what makes her special? I see advantages and disadvantages in both, which do you prefer?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sloth on Sept 11, 2011 14:48:15 GMT -5
it's easier to tell her, that way she feels like you know her. But then if you can move on FROM THERE and get her talking about herself, then it's just another step.
But it doesn't even have to be that complicated man..
|
|
alfonzo
Newcomer
Posts: 7
Registered: May 3, 2011 18:24:36 GMT -5
|
Post by alfonzo on Sept 11, 2011 14:52:00 GMT -5
agreed, thanks. What do you mean it can be less complicated?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sloth on Sept 11, 2011 15:17:24 GMT -5
game isn't a routine and we hate mystery method/ traditional views like that here, we like it to be all natural
get away from routines, get away from using canned material and just be a confident person
|
|
|
|
Post by looknlisten on Sept 11, 2011 15:39:57 GMT -5
What does it mean to qualify and what's behind it
|
|
|
|
Post by jmac on Sept 11, 2011 18:18:10 GMT -5
ohhhhh my goodness
|
|
smoob
Active Member
I'm cooler than that guy...
Posts: 198
Registered: Jan 29, 2011 0:12:51 GMT -5
|
Post by smoob on Sept 11, 2011 20:25:27 GMT -5
As soon as I saw "Mystery" I was like: Oh No! Don't Jmac see this! |
|
alfonzo
Newcomer
Posts: 7
Registered: May 3, 2011 18:24:36 GMT -5
|
Post by alfonzo on Sept 11, 2011 23:40:10 GMT -5
whats with the hate on mystery/classic puas? I would argue that they are the most sound in their skill because more than anyone they (especially Mystery) developed game through empirical practice and evolutionary theory. If game is not built on empiricism then it becomes impossible to tell what is really at play and what's working, and so impossible to effectively teach. I could be wrong and I'm new here, what's the general thinking for you guys?
|
|
|
|
Post by looknlisten on Sept 11, 2011 23:41:06 GMT -5
The MMethod gets results there just comes a point where you won't need it anymore, this self improvement natural stunt will not get new guys results and at then end of the day men have to eat
|
|
smoob
Active Member
I'm cooler than that guy...
Posts: 198
Registered: Jan 29, 2011 0:12:51 GMT -5
|
Post by smoob on Sept 12, 2011 15:40:13 GMT -5
^ lol....men have to eat...
Uhh I never read MM and I only know a little bit of what it teaches so I personally don't care, I just know a lot of the cats on here think it's trash. From what I hear it sounds like a lot of thinking, but if you get laid using it I don't see the problem.
|
|
